Category Archives: Marks

Who Decides What Should Be Measured? – 5/10

This post is part of a 10 day posting challenge issued by Tina Zita. You can’t be a connected educator if you don’t contribute. Sometimes we need a nudge to remember that if nobody shares, nobody learns. Thanks Tina!

_______________________________________________

Who gets to decide what we measure when we assign a

number to our students?

Today I want to pull together thinking from some diverse sources.

Yesterday, while searching for an old tweet, I came across this gem from six years ago from Ira Socol.

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 4.12.20 PM

As well, my friend Sheila Stewart brought this post to my attention:

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 4.18.00 PM

We SAY that we value all of our students equally, but do our structures provide a very different message?

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 3.47.20 PM
University of Toronto General Admission Requirements http://www.artsci.utoronto.ca/futurestudents/admissions/guidance/grades

In a culture that assumes schools will rank students in a way that determines their future, should we be asking deeper questions about our practice?

What does student voice say about this?

In Saskatchewan, there has been some deep thinking into what needs to be taken into consideration before we decide what needs to be measured.

Help Me Tell My Story (Holistic Assessment App) uses technology, integrated with the voice of the community, to ensure that children are comfortable with the types of assessments being conducted.

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 4.27.36 PM

As we consider the work being done in Saskatchewan, we must remember the incomparable Joe Bower’s last powerful blog post.  It is worth your time.

Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 4.31.33 PM
Joe Bower – Another Powerful Blog Post. Please read his work. http://www.joebower.org/2015/12/assessment-and-measurement-are-not-same.html

 

Is a culture that assigns two-digit numbers to our learners still appropriate in 2016?

 

Featured Image: Joe Bower and Deborah Meier from Joe Bower’s blog: http://www.joebower.org/2015/12/assessment-and-measurement-are-not-same.html

Further resources:

Edutopia – When Grading Harms Student Learning (Andrew Miller)

Learning From Afar: CanConnectEd 2015 Live Stream

The live stream for Connect 2015 can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/embed/y_ZmM7zPLyI?rel=0

I was thrilled to catch Jamie Reaburn Weir and Dan Ballentyne today.  They shared this video, which I believe is important for all to watch.  Most educators intrinsically know all of this already.  They do live it, after all.

They just don’t know how to change it.

That’s why more than just educators need to watch.  What kind of world do we want?

Is it not a national tragedy that so many students are turned off learning, and that a number determines their future learning opportunities?

How many brilliant people refuse to play the game?

I will not let an exam result decide my fate:

Dangerously Irrelevant!

When Learning Has Nothing To Do With It

Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 1.38.53 PMLast week, Jan Wong, currently an Assistant Professor of Journalism and Communications at St. Thomas University in New Brunswick, wrote an article for the Chronicle Herald outlining her concern about her Journalism students cheating on quizzes.

The sentences from her post that most resonated with me are below.

Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 1.36.54 PM

It should be no surprise at all that some students at a university are “conditioned to work for marks and only marks”.

The only criterion for acceptance to the university is “high marks”.

Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 1.36.05 PM

When universities filter applicants based on marks, so that only students with really great marks can enter the institution, the students who arrive and attend class there will include those who have learned to play a game very well, and who will continue to play that game when they arrive.

Any senior high school teacher can attest to the fact that learning is not the priority for many grade 11 and 12 students.  The priority is getting the highest two-digit number possible through whatever means are necessary so that he/she can get access to a university program.

The ramifications of this selection process are numerous, and often do not relate to learning at all.  Some are, in fact, very negative.

  • Parents may bully the teachers who don’t give the needed or expected grades.
  • Students may select courses based on who they know will give them the marks they want.
  • Parents will track down a Principal in the summer and demand that their child’s marks be changed.
  • Students tell teachers that the mark they have received for their assignment is “unacceptable” and that they will need something higher.
  • “Cheating” is rampant on tests, exams and assignments.
  • Students learn to seek out exams from previous years, tests and student notes from previous years.
  • They learn how best to get as many marks as possible on every test and exam.
  • They will do almost anything for “bonus marks”, and they learn to manipulate a teacher to offer those “bonus marks”.

Students and parents figure out how to play the game.

Alfie Kohn has been writing about the problem with grades for many years.  One of his best articles is “From Degrading to De-Grading”  (http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/fdtd-g.htm), where he explores, among other things, the observations that grades reduce a student’s preference for challenging tasks, the quality of their thinking, and their interest in learning.

The lack of interest in learning by students who have been told that marks are what matters is well-documented, as in the observation below from Janice Fiamengo:

Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 3.07.41 PM
http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-unteachables-a-generation-that-cannot-learn/?singlepage=true

Those who do well are called “good students”.  Some schools give out awards to students with the highest marks, encouraging competition instead of collaborative learning, and reinforcing that marks are what is really important at that school.

While there is a large and growing movement to put learning at the centre of the what school is about, as long as that final mark is the only requirement for university entrance, marks will remain the focus.

And universities will get what they have selected for.  When students don’t get the marks they want at university, they will react exactly as they have learned to react.

Once again, Janice Fiamengo:

Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 2.08.22 PM
http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-unteachables-a-generation-that-cannot-learn/?singlepage=true

Fortunately, even the straight-A students are questioning  their school experience and why “marks” are seen as so important. Afraj Gill from “An A+ Student Regrets His Grades“:

Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 2.35.19 PM

Learning to manipulate teachers to get good grades becomes an art form in itself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8s13_yOLeE

We need to deeply question a system with these values.  Is this the best way to graduate innovators and entrepreneurs?

I believe that we are rethinking what schools are for, how to nurture natural curiosity, and how to use focused innovation in our teaching in the K-12 sector.  I also see evidence that some post-secondary schools are beginning to understand that marks are not the best predictor of learning.

But as long as marks are the sole filter for entrance to university, we will be challenged to put learning, not grades, at the centre of what schools are for.

*Add-On -> A favourite post from @KarlFisch: http://thefischbowl.blogspot.ca/2013/10/your-gda-is-more-important-than-your-gpa.html

@sethgodinblog: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2014/02/doing-what-gets-rewarded.html

Screen Shot 2014-02-20 at 8.32.56 AM
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2014/02/doing-what-gets-rewarded.html